What is the capital intended to achieve?
Objectives, the role in a broader investment plan, and how progress should be assessed.
For capital partners
Ooventive manages capital for investors. We begin with the purpose of the capital, then define how opportunities should be considered, decisions made, and the relationship reviewed.
Alignment before allocation
A shared interest in an opportunity is only the beginning. A capital relationship needs clear boundaries, responsibilities, and expectations.
We frame the discussion around your objectives and the role this capital is intended to play. Investment scope, time horizon, liquidity considerations, and governance inform the structure of a potential mandate.
See how managed capital differs from direct investmentThe mandate framework
A working framework for discussion. Specific terms are established in the relevant agreements.
Objectives, the role in a broader investment plan, and how progress should be assessed.
Areas of interest, types of opportunities, concentration considerations, and exclusions.
Capital commitments, liquidity needs, and the implications of investing in private businesses.
Investment authority, approvals, oversight, and the process for addressing conflicts.
Fees, expenses, and any incentive arrangements, as agreed for the relationship.
Reporting content and frequency, valuation practices, and how material developments are communicated.
A useful first discussion
Start with context rather than confidential documents.
Start a capital partner conversationYour organization or professional background, the purpose of the capital, the areas you want to explore, and your expected time horizon. You do not need to share account details or financial statements.
This website does not present a standard fund or subscription offering. Investment parameters, structure, responsibilities, and economics are discussed for the proposed relationship.
Direct investment uses Ooventive’s own capital. Managed capital is invested for investors within an agreed mandate. The two models have distinct capital sources and responsibilities. Any potential overlap should be addressed explicitly in the relevant arrangements.
The first discussion establishes whether there is a useful basis for further exploration. Any subsequent review, documentation, and engagement are specific to the relationship. An introduction creates no investment commitment.
From objectives to a working mandate
A mandate should make the investment relationship understandable before individual opportunities are considered. It connects the investor’s purpose with the scope of activity, the responsibilities of each party, and the information needed for oversight.
The subjects below are discussion areas. The actual structure, reporting arrangements, economics, and investment terms are established for the relevant engagement.
Discuss what the capital is intended to achieve, the expected time horizon, areas of interest, exclusions, and constraints. Clarify how those objectives would influence the selection of opportunities.
Define who can make which decisions, what requires approval, and how matters are escalated. Where Ooventive’s own capital and managed capital may have overlapping interests, discuss allocation and potential conflicts explicitly.
Consider which information helps explain investment activity and the position of the mandate: holdings, commitments, cash movements, valuation context, material developments, expenses, and progress against the agreed objectives. The appropriate content and frequency depend on the relationship.
Objectives and circumstances can evolve. Discuss how a change in scope, a material event, or a request to revisit the mandate would be considered, documented, and communicated.
Founders. Investors. New possibilities.